• testing more testing

    this is just a test

    it looks like other tests but this one is mine.

    more words words words

  • Type Your Headline Here ...

    NAYPYITAW, Myanmar (Reuters) - Myanmar's central bank wants to weaken its newly floated currency and prevent further rises that could derail reforms to its economy, a deputy central bank governor said.

    Nay Aye, one of two deputy governors, added that foreign banks will be able to form joint ventures in Myanmar by 2014, a year earlier than expected, as foreign investors begin to size up one of Asia's most promising frontier markets following the suspension of U.S. and European sanctions.

    April's floating of the currency, the kyat, was the biggest economic policy step in a year of dramatic change. Managing the kyat poses an extraordinary challenge for reformers struggling to rebuild an economy blighted by decades of mismanagement and hurt by trade-crippling sanctions.

    The International Monetary Fund cautioned in a report this month that the kyat had been overvalued by as much as 40 percent this year, and that any further rise could hurt the economy.

    Asked if he would like to bring down the currency's value, Nay Aye said "yes", noting the central bank was developing a fund for carrying out open-market operations and stabilizing the currency.

    "In the near future there will be a massive inflow of foreign direct investment, and as a result Myanmar's kyat is expected to appreciate. We will do our best to prevent this," he told Reuters in an interview.

    Currency reform is a delicate task in Myanmar. In 1987, the sudden cancellation of certain banknote denominations by late dictator General Ne Win wiped out many people's savings and helped trigger a pro-democracy uprising the following year crushed by the military, killing thousands.

    But much has changed since then, signified by this month's swearing-in of pro-democracy leader Aung San Suu Kyi in a parliament stacked with some of the same generals who locked up the Nobel Peace Prize winner for much of the past two decades.

    President Thein Sein, a reformist former general, has urged parliament and his cabinet to pursue the most breathtaking reforms in the former British colony since a 1962 military coup when it was known as Burma.

    These include the freeing of hundreds of political prisoners, an easing in media controls and peace deals with groups of armed ethnic minorities.

    Nay Aye said a new foreign currency management law that would further lift trading restrictions on the currency had been approved by parliament and would be enacted soon, making it more freely traded and further curbing the black market.

    The managed float of the kyat was intended to unify a chaotic array of informal exchange rates that had surged in value from more than 1,000 per dollar in 2009 as money flowed into the timber, energy and gem industries, mostly from China.

    The central bank now sets a reference rate after a daily currency auction involving 17 dealer banks, a first step towards developing a formal interbank market. The reference rate was 835 kyat per dollar on Friday, compared with 818 on April 2, the first day of the managed float.

    Exporters say those levels make their goods uncompetitive.

    ACCELERATING BANK REFORM

    Speaking at the central bank's headquarters in the capital, Naypyitaw, Nay Aye added that foreign banks would be allowed to form joint ventures in Myanmar from 2014, a year before Southeast Asian countries are expected to formally integrate their economies.

    Despite a year of wide-ranging political reforms, Myanmar's government has been slow to revise laws on the growing number tantalizingbanks clamoring to tap the country of 60 million people, whose natural gas, minerals and other resources make it one of Asia's most tantalizing new markets.

    As the United States and European Union lift economic sanctions, foreign banks remain limited to representative offices that can do little more than conduct research.

    Nay Aye said in 2014, banks from countries in the 10-member Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) will be allowed in, with banks from other countries following afterwards. But the central bank is seeking to change regulations to allow foreign banks from elsewhere to form joint ventures in 2014.

    "The ASEAN integration process requires allowing qualified banks from ASEAN to open branches in the country with effect from 2014. We are doing our best to be able to fulfill this requirement," Nay Aye said. "Especially we are thinking of allowing joint-ventures with foreign banks and branches of foreign banks."

    "This is something we have to carry out after laying down firm rules, regulations and procedures," he added. "At the first stage, ASEAN banks will be allowed under ASEAN financial integration process and at the second stage banks from other regions beyond ASEAN."

    Myanmar is a member of ASEAN. In 2015, the group is scheduled to form an EU-style economic bloc to lower barriers to the flow of people, products and, to some extent, capital across its borders.

    MODERNISATION ESSENTIAL

    In its report this month, the IMF said accelerating the modernization of the financial sector was essential to prepare for economic integration in 2015.

    But it also noted the authorities' worries about capacity constraints, in particular a lack of experienced local bankers: "They preferred a gradual liberalization, indicating that many domestic banks are not ready for price competition, notwithstanding the need to prepare for ASEAN integration."

    Dozens of local and foreign banks thrived in the 1950s. But the industry withered after a 1962 coup introduced a disastrous "Burmese Way to Socialism" and sweeping nationalization.

    In 1988, the country's former military rulers reintroduced a market economy. Soon after, in 1992, private banks were allowed and foreign banks began opening representative offices. There were over 40 at one point but only 18 are open now.

    Decades of dictatorship and the brutal suppression of pro-democracy activists brought layers of U.S. and European economic sanctions. Concerns over money laundering from the drug trade - Myanmar is the world's second-largest opium producer - eventually quarantined the financial system.

    In 2003, shady money-lending practices caught up with the sector, sparking a crisis exacerbated by inept decision-making at the central bank. Three banks collapsed.

    (Editing by Alan Raybould and Richard Borsuk)

  • Geithner rains on Boehner's parade

    Associated Press

    House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) yesterday said he would do in 2013 exactly what he did in 2011: use the debt ceiling to hold the nation hostage. As Boehner sees it, Democrats have to give in, or he'll trash the full faith and credit of the United States and crash the economy on purpose.

    And why did Boehner declare his intentions in mid-May? Because the Speaker is trying to shape upcoming tax-policy negotiations, applying leverage to get what he wants. The problem, as Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner noted yesterday, is that Boehner's calendar doesn't quite work.

    At the end of this year, an enormous fight is looming over taxes and revenue, when all of the Bush-era tax cuts are set to expire, just as major spending cuts from the debt-ceiling agreement are set to begin. This doesn't directly relate to the debt-ceiling fight, but Boehner wants it to -- yesterday was partly about sending a signal to the White House. The Speaker was effectively saying, "I'm holding a gun to the nation's head; if you don't want me to pull the trigger, don't push for any tax increases."

    But Geithner spoke at the same fiscal summit, and said something interesting.

    "[O]n the current estimates ... we're likely to hit the debt limit sometime before the end of the year, but Congress has given the executive branch a set of tools that buy [administration officials] some time. And those tools will probably take us into the early part of 2013, thus separating somewhat the timing of the expiry of the tax cuts and the sequester with the ultimate need for Congress to act on the debt limit. You know, they should do it as soon as they can, but that's the basic sequence in this context."

    That may sound a little clunky, but in everyday terms, the Treasury Secretary was explaining that policymakers will be dealing with expiring tax cuts and triggered spending cuts in December, but won't be dealing with the debt ceiling until January and February.

    Boehner wants to tie the debt limit to the December discussion, but the administration has no reason to play along. Indeed, at this point, we don't even know who'll be the President or the House Speaker the next time the ceiling needs to be raised.

    To be sure, the variables may change, and as Brian Beutler noted, if federal receipts slow, the deadline for the debt-ceiling vote may come much sooner.

    But for now, Boehner has a strategy that he probably won't be able to execute.

  • John Edwards case swings on two little words: 'the' or 'a'

    The defense rested Wednesday without calling John Edwards or his daughter Cate to the stand. Analysts say not testifying carries risks. NBC's Lisa Myers reports from Greensboro, N.C.

    Updated at 6:56 p.m. ET: John Edwards' fate could rest on what the word "the" means when his corruption trial enters its final phase Thursday morning. 


    Stacey Klein and Michael Austin of NBC News and Ben Edwards of NBC station WCNC of Charlotte, N.C., contributed to this report. Follow M. Alex Johnson on Twitter and Facebook.


    Closing statements in the former Democratic presidential candidate's trial begin Thursday at 9:15 a.m. ET in U.S. District Court in Greensboro, N.C. That's where Edwards — a former U.S. senator and the 2004 Democratic vice presidential nominee — is charged with six felony counts of accepting about $1 million in unreported campaign donations from two wealthy supporters at a time when federal election law limited individual political contributions to $2,300 per election cycle. 

    Jury deliberations are expected to begin Friday.


    The trial unexpectedly moved closer to a conclusion when Edwards' lawyers abruptly rested their case Wednesday morning without calling Edwards or his onetime mistress, Rielle Hunter.

     

    After the jury was dismissed for the day, David Harbach, the chief prosecutor for the Justice Department, and Abbe Lowell, Edwards' lead attorney, haggled for more than two hours about the instructions U.S. District Judge Catherine Eagles will read to the jury after closing statements. 

    Perhaps the most contested issue centers on the language of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (.pdf), the statute Edwards is accused of having violated, which specifies that excess contributions are illegal if they are made "for the purpose of influencing any election for Federal office."

    The most important word is "the." Edwards' lawyers argue that it means the jury must find that Edwards conspired to accept illegal contributions solely to help his presidential election campaign. 

    The government, by contrast, essentially argued that it can be read to mean "a purpose," contending that the contributions were illegal if Edwards used the money to influence the election along with other purposes, such as sparing his wife, the late Elizabeth Edwards, the humiliation of the affair.

    Eagles indicated late Wednesday afternoon that she will instruct jurors that the government doesn't have to prove that the payments by billionaire heiress Rachel "Bunny" Mellon and the late Fred Baron were for the "sole benefit" of influencing primary elections in January 2008. 

    But she said she would also tell them that a guilty verdict should be based on something more than just a side benefit to the Edwards campaign. Specifically, Eagles suggested that the jurors should be told that if they find that the real purpose of the payments was personal, the money cannot be considered an unlawful contribution.

    Eagles could still change her mind about some issues before she files the final instructions Wednesday evening. They won't be made public until Eagles gives them to the jury after closing arguments, which are expected to stretch well into Thursday afternoon.

    No Edwards or Hunter
    It was a subdued ending to the defense phase of the trial, disappointing scores of people who had lined up  two hours before court opened, anticipating they might get an opportunity to hear from Edwards, Hunter and Edwards' daughter Cate Edwards Upham.

    Legal analysts had predicted that Upham would certainly testify Wednesday and that Edwards was likely to.

    But Lowell rested the defense case after Eagles denied another attempt to introduce evidence that Donald McGahn, a member of the Federal Election Commission, disagrees with the government's theory that the payments for Hunter constituted illegal campaign contributions.

    Watch US News videos on msnbc.com

    Lowell tried to introduce an audiotape of McGahn saying at a July 2011 FEC meeting that, even assuming everything the government claims is true, the payments were contributions that should have been reported.

    The audio is available here from the FEC's website.

    But Eagles said, "I don't think the opinions of others ... are particularly helpful to this jury" — essentially the same reasoning she gave last week in ruling out testimony from former FEC members who had been expected to say they also thought the contributions were legal.

    The jury was left with the final testimony of Jim Walsh, a former FBI agent hired by the defense who traced the money trail.

    Walsh testified Tuesday that Baron, finance director for his presidential campaign, gave Hunter monthly payments totaling $74,000 in the second half of 2008 — well after the campaign had ended and some of it even after Edwards publicly admitted the affair.

    Former Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards has faced public and private challenges throughout his life and career.

    "The only logical reason for making these payments at the time they were made was exactly what John Edwards has been saying: 'I'm trying to protect my wife from finding out that I'm the father of Rielle Hunter's baby,'" said Kieran Shanahan, a former federal prosecutor.

    Another major point of the defense argument is that Edwards didn't know what the money from Baron and Mellon was being used for, a contention that was supported Tuesday by John Moylan, who worked in both of Edwards' presidential campaigns.

    Moylan testified that Edwards was shocked to learn in August 2008 — several months after the fact — that Mellon had been paying to help support Hunter and keep her from the public eye. The money was given through checks falsely labeled as furniture purchases through Andrew Young, who was once a top aide to Edwards and is now his chief accuser.

    Referring to Young as "that damn Andrew," Edwards told Mellon, "Bunny, you should not be sending money to anyone," Moylan testified.

    More content from msnbc.com and NBC News:

    Follow US News on msnbc.com on Twitter and Facebook